‘I’m here to understand what you mean by Taliban’:Arundhati Roy in Pakistan

Celebrated Indian author and social activist Arundhati Roy addresses a gathering at the Karachi Press Club on Friday.-Photo WhiteStar/Fahim Siddiqui

Celebrated Indian author and social activist Arundhati Roy addresses a gathering at the Karachi Press Club on Friday.-Photo WhiteStar/Fahim Siddiqui

The media coverage of Arundhati Roy visit to Karachi on May 8 , 2009 was posted to me by Mr Noormuhammad of Pakistan. It is important for us to assess what our fellow Indians say about India when they address audiences of another country. This becomes even more pronounced when addressing the neighbouring countries. Mr LK Advani too went to Pakistan in 2005 and addressed the Pakistani audience. As an author (God Of Small things) and social activitist in India Arundhati’s views may or may not necessarily be the view of Indians but India is committed to the fundamental right of free speech . So be it. …

by Salman Siddiqui/Dawn .com

Is there a threat of Talibanisation engulfing the entire region?

I think it has already engulfed our region. I think there’s a need for a very clear thinking (on this issue of Talibanisation). In India, there are two kinds of terrorism: one is Islamic terrorism and the other Maoist terrorism. But this term terrorism, we must ask, what do they mean by it.

In Pakistan, I’m here to understand what they mean by this term. When we say we must fight the Taliban or must defeat them, what does it mean? I’m here to understand what you mean when you say Taliban. Do you mean a militant? Do you mean an ideology? Exactly what is it that is being fought? That needs to be clarified.

I think both needs to be fought. But if it’s an ideology it has to be fought differently, while if it’s a person with a gun then it has to be fought differently. We know from the history of the war on terror that a military strategy is only making matters worse all over the world. The war on terror has made the world a more dangerous place. In India, they have been fighting insurgencies military since 1947 and it has become a more dangerous place.

Swat and the Taliban boy

It is very important for me to understand what exactly is going in Swat. How did it start? A Taliban boy asked me why women can’t be like plastic bags and banned. The point is that the plastic bag was made in a factory but so was the boy. He was made in a factory that is producing this kind of mind(set). (The question is) who owns that factory, who funds it? Unless we deal with that factory, dealing with the boy doesn’t help us.

Water is the main issue

One danger in Pakistan is that we talk about the threat of Taliban so much that other important issues lose focus. In my view, the problem of water in the world will become the most important problem. I think big dams are economically unviable, environmentally unsustainable and politically undemocratic. They are a way of taking away a river from the poor and giving it to the rich. Like in India, there’s an issue of SEZs (Special Economic Zones), whereby the land of the people are given to corporations. But the bigger problem is that there are making dams and giving water to the industries. This way the people who live in villages by the streams and rivers have no water for themselves. So building dams is one of the most ecologically destructive things that you can do.

Fight over Siachen glacier

There are thousands of Pakistani and Indian soldiers deployed on the Siachen glacier. Both of our countries are spending billions of dollars on high altitude warfare and weapons. The whole of the Siachen glacier is sort of an icy monument to human folly. Each day it is being filled with ice axes, old boots, tents and so on. Meanwhile, that battlefield is melting. Siachen glacier is about half its size now. It’s not melting because the Indian and Pakistani soldiers are on it. But it’s because people somewhere on the other side of the world are leading a good life….in countries that call themselves democracies that believe in human rights and free speech. Their economies depend on selling weapons to both of us. Now, when that glacier melts, there will be floods first, then there will be a drought and then we’ll have even more reasons to fight. We’ll buy more weapons from those democracies and in this way human beings will prove themselves to be the stupidest animals on earth.

Money and the Indian elections

Whatever system of government you have, whether it is a military dictatorship or a democracy, and you have that for a long time, eventually big money manages to subvert it. That has begun to happen even in a democracy (like India). For example, political parties need a lot of publicity, but the media is also run by corporate money. If you look at the big political parties like the Congress and the BJP, you see how much money is being put out just in their advertising budgets. Now where does all that come from?

RSS and the Indian establishment

The RSS has infiltrated everything to a great extent. In India, we have 120-150 million Muslims and it’s considered a minority…It’s impossible to not belong to a minority of some sort in India. Caste or ethnicity or religion or whatever, in some way everyone belongs to a minority. The fights that many of us are waging against the RSS and against the BJP are to say that we live in a society which accommodates everybody. Everybody doesn’t have to love everybody, but everybody has to be accommodated. The RSS has infiltrated the (Indian) army as much as various kinds of Wahabism or other kinds of religious ideology have infiltrated the ISI or the armed forces in Pakistan. They are human beings like everyone else and they too get influenced.

Indian media and sensationalizing of news coming out from Pakistan

I think the media in both countries play this game. Whenever something happens here, they hype it up there, while when something happens there, they hype the news here. We say that we live in times of an information revolution and free press, but even then nobody gets to know the complete picture…

The Pakistani media is a little different from the Indian media. They stand on a slightly different foundation. But both share the problem of a lack of accountability…The trouble in India is that 90 per cent of their revenue comes from the corporate sector…there’s increasing privatization and corporatization of governance, education, health, infrastructure and water management. So in India you see an open criticism of governance, but very rarely criticism of corporations. It’s a structural problem. It’s not about good people or bad people. It’s just that you can’t expect a company to work against itself. This is a very serious issue which needs to be sorted out.

Is the Indian army a sacred cow?

The Indian army is quite a sacred cow especially on TV and Bollywood. But at the same time if you talk to the people in the Indian army, they say that they feel that the media is very critical of them. I don’t share that view. I think it is a sacred cow. People are willing to give them a lot of leeway.

Women and their fight for justice

When women fight for justice, we must fight for every kind of justice…We must fight for justice for men and justice for children. Because if you fight for one kind of justice and you tolerate another, then it’s a pretty hollow fight. You may not be able to fight every battle, but you should be able to put yourself on the line and say I believe this.

9 responses to this post.

  1. she is in the wrong city then,send her to swat and she will know!!

    Like

    Reply

  2. Posted by neel123 on May 11, 2009 at 3:15 PM

    This idiot, who lived a third rated life until the miracle of Booker happened, needs to know her limits.

    People like her, that has little understanding of Geo-Strategics, no appreciation of history, and no sense of Nationalism, needs to be kicked out of public life !

    Like

    Reply

  3. Posted by Jay Shah on May 12, 2009 at 5:55 PM

    This stupid and anti-national woman need not be given any importance by anyone. She is suffering from OCD big time, what she needs is a psychitrist. She is as stupid as her blabberings.

    Like

    Reply

  4. Posted by Noor Muhammad on May 13, 2009 at 6:13 AM

    I was surprised to see the appreciation of the “freedom of speech”, in the form of 3 fascistic comments, so far, on the post 🙂

    Arundhati Roy is hated in India, just like Dr Pervez Hoodbhoy is hated in Pakistan because these people have the guts and the dignity to side with the truth, instead of following murky ideologies of ‘strategic national interests’

    Like

    Reply

  5. Posted by alisha on May 13, 2009 at 6:40 AM

    Arundhati is known to create controversies wid sole motive of being in lime-light …she tries to pose as an intellectual on all affairs that she has no knowledge of …she beileives in half truths as she has no knowledge and tries to make the world also believe in them . she must understand that she cant fool indians

    Like

    Reply

  6. Ms Roy is aptly described by Alisha. I have nothing more to add to it. Needs immediate treatment, before she goes totally mad..out of control..

    Like

    Reply

  7. Its in the veins of most of us. We dont dare to speak out anything against the listeners.. Be it LK Advani or Arundhati Roy!!
    A very nice post …. Showing the true colors of Indian Social Workers…

    Like

    Reply

  8. Ours is a democracy and everyone has a right to air their views. This doesn’t however mean that one can think of oneself as an expert.
    Without due qualification or any past experience in the field, it better to take the opinion of experts and reach a conclusion to be able to put across a point of view to a large section of people. Without such experience or data base ones utterings may bring deep distress. With this in mind, one needs to assess whether one is fit to make comments or are the facts ones personal belief and only of ones own thinking and making without any substantiating data to support the opinion.
    In the media they say –“The more ludicrous.. the more sensational”—But we as people feel that a person may do more harm to those for whom one is willing to do good. A balanced perception could go a long way in educating people about the pros and cons of each situation …only then we can reach a conclusion as to what is good for us.

    Like

    Reply

  9. Posted by prakash on May 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM

    now enough

    Like

    Reply

Leave a reply to saanjh Cancel reply